This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Print Page   |   Sign In   |   Learn more about Membership
NFRC News Now
Blog Home All Blogs

NFRC Documents Close to ANSI Approval

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Thursday, September 25, 2014

Joe Hayden reported to the board that NFRC’s 100, 200, and 400 documents are close to receiving ANSI approval.

“It’s been a lot of work, but thing have gone smoothly,” Hayden said. “We’re nearly there.”

All comments have been resolved, and the final application will go to ANSI next week.

“This should be completed by the end of the year,” Hayden concluded.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

WINDOW7/THERM7 Implementation Set for January 2015

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Thursday, September 25, 2014

NFRC’s board unanimously approved a motion to implement WINDOW7/THERM7 for all certification purposes.

It will take effect on January 1, 2015.

The motion established April 1, 2015 as the sunset date for WINDOW6/THERM6.

It will also allow labs to use W7/T7 under the guidelines stated in Technical Bulletin 2014-05 prior to January 1, 2015 on more than three product lines with staff pre-approval.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Lundall Sees Need for Fenestration Energy Performance Ratings in South Africa

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Denise Lundall addressed the membership today, citing the need for improved attention on fenestration ratings in South Africa.

“Fenestration is not yet mature, but we’re collaborating with several organizations, including NFRC to make improvements.” Lundall said.

Lundall, from the South African National Energy Development Institute (SANEDI), pointed out three areas with room for advancement. These include the following:

Providing fair, accurate, and credible energy performance ratings for fenestration products.

  • Administering an independent, third party certification and labeling program.
  • Creating a certified product directory with energy performance information for fenestration products.
  • Lundall added that the primary concern in South Africa’s hot climate is keeping homes and buildings cool.

“We need to take everything into account when creating a better building envelope. We’re after a harmonious rating system and regulations to create a holistic program,” Lundall concluded. “NFRC is assisting with what needs to happen.”

More information is available at:

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

McGowan Summarizes Research and Technical Committee Block

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Wednesday, September 24, 2014

NFRC's Senior Program Manager, Ray McGowan, highlights the proceedings from the Research and Technology Committee Proceedings

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

DOE Seeks NFRC's Input for Guding Research

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Wednesday, September 24, 2014

For those attending the meeting, be sure to stop by the front of the meeting room and help NFRC provide direction to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

They are asking NFRC members to help them select which products hold the most interest for research.

DOE announced the initiative during part of its "Bringing Innovations to Market" program.

DOE representative, Karma Sawyer, is on hand to answer your questions.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Hayden Named NFRC's Member-of-the-Year

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Monday, September 22, 2014

Joe Hayden (Pella Corp.) accepted the 2014 Dariush Arasteh Member-of-the year award during today’s opening session.

NFRC CEO, Jim Benney, announced the award, thanking Hayden for his 18 years of service and dedication to developing NFRC's programs.

“I’ve said a lot of times that I don’t know of a harder working group of people than the folks at NFRC,” Hayden said. “It’s truly an honor to work with all of them and to receive this award.”

Hayden has worked at Pella for 26 years and is currently the Senior Engineer, Technical Leader-Products.

He previously held a position on the board of directors and chaired several board committees. Hayden chairs the ANS Standards Committee and is an active member of the Technical, Ratings, Research and Technology, and Regulatory Affairs and Marketing Committees.  He participates in all subcommittees as well as numerous task groups.

Mike Thoman, NFRC's member-of-the-year for 2013, congratulated Hayden on his accomplishment.

"No one deserves this more," Thoman said. "Joe's commitment and enthusiasm will serve us well as we navigate the future of fenestration energy performance ratings."

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

25th Anniversary Membership Meeting Underway in Victoria

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Monday, September 22, 2014

NFRC’s 25th anniversary membership meeting got underway in Victoria, British Columbia this afternoon with board chair, Jeff Baker, reflecting on the organization’s progress.

“I was at the meeting at Vancouver when NFRC was born,” Baker said. “There were some lively discussions then, and there are still some lively discussions going on today.”

Baker pointed out that it's this kind of open dialogue among members that led NFRC to success and will further refine its programs as it moves forward.

“It’s great to see our organization continuing to grow,” Baker said.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Chair Says NFRC's 25th Anniversary Shows Courage, Resilience

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Friday, September 12, 2014

In this posting, NFRC Chair, Jeff Baker, reflects on the organization's success as it prepares for its membership meeting in Victoria, British Columbia, September 22-25.

Dear Members and Guests:

It is my honor and good fortune to serve as NFRC’s Chair as we celebrate our 25th anniversary.

It is easy to forget now, but when NFRC started 25 years ago, it faced a lot of skeptics. Many thought we had embarked on a "mission impossible." Our goal to establish standards for rating the energy performance of fenestration products aroused cynicism and was treated as a well-meaning fantasy.

Many people questioned our ability and our commitment, but as we gather this week, close to where it all began, it is clear that NFRC has proven its skeptics wrong.  

Our ability to overcome the obstacles we faced and achieve success is inseparably linked not only to our ambition but also to the supporting relationships we formed along the way. Yet, neither of these -- important as they are -- fully capture what NFRC is and what we celebrate.

There are also more subtle qualities. For some it is that NFRC is both large and small. Being large in spirit yet relatively small in size has allowed our members to create rapport with one another and with NFRC’s staff. For others, it is the fulfilling notion that NFRC’s programs serve the public and make a positive difference in the real world that serves as their highest achievement.   

For me, however, it is the ongoing quest to improve what we do that remains central to NFRC’s evolving character. Throughout our history, our commitment to improvement has grown through our steadfast belief in the social usefulness of our work and through the belief in the value of the ideas of those who are with us and those who preceded us.

Reflecting on the past 25 years prompts a storehouse of fond memories and heightens my appreciation for everyone who has shared in our journey.

It is a great privilege to participate with so many knowledgeable and dedicated people in the ongoing task of building an organization of distinction. I extend a special note of gratitude to all those who have helped NFRC in this effort.

The obstacles we overcame to get here today have only strengthened us. Through our perseverance we found courage and resilience. Through our drive and determination we have not only endured but flourished. Most important, however, it is through this same pioneering spirit that we will become even stronger in the years ahead.


Jeff Baker

Jeff Baker


This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Protect Your Reputation and Your Investment With Accurate Energy Ratings

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Thursday, September 11, 2014

By Ray McGowan

Non NFRC certified commercial window energy ratings are frequently submitted for energy code compliance.  Documents submitted making reference to NFRC 100 and NFRC 200, which can vary widely, may be submitted as evidence of energy code compliance and but they may not meet the NFRC 100 and/or 200 requirements the reasons described below.

If a submitted document references the NFRC 100, it may not comply since NFRC 100, section 4.1.1 (compliance, product line simulation and testing) mandates each product line must have an associated validation test.  For products rated using CMAST, section 5.9.4 requires each framing product line to have an associated validation test.    A code compliance document referencing NFRC 100 and/or 200, without the required associated product line validation test, does not fully comply with NFRC 100 and should not be accepted as proof of energy code compliance.  The same is true of a CMAST bid report unless it is using approved framing components, not those in the design stage, which then have a validation test associated with the framing product line.

National energy code documents, such as the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), CA Title 24, and ASHRAE 90.1, require window energy performance be determined according to NFRC 100 and NFRC 200. Without the required validation testing, NFRC 100 and 200 requirements are not satisfied. 

Therefore, NFRC advises the industry any non-validated NFRC 100 (U-factor) referencing report or document may not be fully NFRC 100 and 200 compliant and may not satisfy the IECC, CA Title 24, and ASHRAE 90.1 code requirements for NFRC 100 and 200.  These documents should not be used for energy code compliance without  the required validation testing documentation for the associated product line (or using approved framing components in CMAST). Please contact NFRC with questions on any energy code document where this may apply.

Help Us Protect NFRC’s Reputation and Investment

NFRC’s mission is to provide the public with fair, accurate, and credible fenestration product energy performance ratings. Our 25 year commitment to that mission has made us successful and increased consumer trust of the entire industry. In addition, NFRC members, participants, and the US DOE have invested significantly in its commercial ratings program and are working diligently to gain marketplace acceptance. By adhering to the NFRC 100 requirements, you are helping us accomplish this.  We hope you will do your part to help NFRC preserve its reputation as an unbiased, third-party certification body and assist in maintaining the integrity of the programs we have all worked so hard to build.

Contact NFRC's Senior Program Manager, Ray McGowan with questions about this article.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Not Your Father’s Code Development Process

Posted By Tom Herron, National Fenestration Rating Council, Thursday, September 4, 2014

By Todd Sims, Program Associate, Institute for Market Transformation

Who remembers logging onto AOL using the old dial-up modems? I am sure you can hear it now. It seemed like a good idea at the time and got the job done, but in in retrospect, the process seems comically slow and inefficient. You could say the same about the state of the model building code development process.

The process used to require code officials to commit to a lengthy and expensive pilgrimage to code-geek Mecca: the International Code Council’s Public Comment Hearings. These annual hearings are where code officials gather to spend up to 12 hours a day, for up to a week, locked in a steely, fluorescent-lit conference room voting on changes to the model code. And those are just the officials who care!

This year, however, we usher in a new way of doing things: cdpACCESS. This is a biggest change in U.S. building codes since the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire of 1911.

The reason this is such a big deal is that it is a change in process. It’s more than just a typical, hotly contested code change proposal—whether to add residential sprinklers or not, increase R-Values, Solar Heat-Gain Coefficients—it is a complete tectonic shift in who participates in the code development process and how they participate. The new protocol will completely democratize the process, enfranchising tens of thousands of code officials.

The old way of doing things required code officials to be at the hearings, in person, in order to vote on code change proposals. This often meant missing up to a week of work and paying exorbitant travel costs (often during an era of travel freezes). The shortcomings of the development process up until now has fostered a number of problems, not the least of which has been the disenfranchisement of smaller jurisdictions who can’t afford the lost productivity of absent code officials or the travel costs. No matter how interested or well intentioned the average code official was, it often wasn’t feasible for them to attend.

For the first time, code officials from across the country will be able to cast their votes on code change proposals right from their computers—at home, at the office, or along with coworkers—wherever and whenever is most convenient for them. They will also be able to make better-informed decisions, with the opportunity to review numerous resources and expert testimony, without being subject to a time limit. These changes don’t just remove barriers to entry; they crush them.

Code hearings often have as little as 100 participants. We need to make that 10,000.

There are few examples in the construction arena that can match the stakes of model code development. There is a lot on the line for product manufacturers, home builders, code officials, and consumer advocates; the process is surprisingly political. Previously, the cities that could afford to send delegates were lobbied hard for their acceptance of code change proposals. cdpACCESS levels the playing field by making sure that every code official has the opportunity to vote.

One unintended consequence of the old way of doing things is that code officials in small towns across the country began feeling the code didn’t belong to them, that the codes were being promulgated by the big cities of the east and west coasts. By feeling left out and disenfranchised, they grew a lack of will to enforce the codes, particularly the building energy code.

cdpACCESS gives the opportunity to engage these code officials in the pursuit of building safer, energy efficient, and resilient communities—and that is the reason why I am so excited about this change. It presents the opportunity to bring tens of thousands of code officials to the table and participate in a process where the end result affects every single person. 

But we shouldn’t stop there and we shouldn’t be shortsighted. cdpACCESS gives us a chance to start over, not just to pass or defeat a single code change proposal, but to consider some major issues facing the codes world, such as:

  • In a recent survey conducted by ICC and the National Institute of Building Sciences, over 80 percent of code officials expect to retire in the next 15 years. How can we use cdpACCESS to attract and engage the next generation of code officials?
  • How can we use this new tool to engage more code officials on issues of compliance and enforcement?
  • How can we leverage the new system to further advance market transformation in building energy codes?
  • How can we, as a community, use this tool to gain more building energy efficiency advocates in unexpected places?

The answers to these questions, and many others, will come in many forms. But there’s one thing we know right now: We need smart people with big ideas.

*A schedule of free cdpACCESS webinars can be viewed at To see answers to questions about cdpACCESS, go to

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
Page 6 of 16
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  >   >>   >| 
Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal